oh, yeah, the supreme court thing:
Oct. 2nd, 2008 10:17 amPersonally, I've disagreed with a couple of supreme court decisions. I'm disappointed with the court's reasoning in Reno v. ACLU, because that just means the same issue will come up again in more and different disguises.
However, the real prize of all of this have been Joe Biden's answers -- for those who don't know, Biden's also getting asked the same questions as Palin. After listening to Palin fumble, wouldn't you rather have a VP who gave this as an answer?
For the relevance of interstate commerce to deciding whether something is a federal issue or not, see here. For Violence Against Women act, see here.
However, the real prize of all of this have been Joe Biden's answers -- for those who don't know, Biden's also getting asked the same questions as Palin. After listening to Palin fumble, wouldn't you rather have a VP who gave this as an answer?
COURIC: (to Biden): What are the Supreme Court decisions you disagree with?
BIDEN: You know, I’m the guy who wrote the Violence Against Women act. And I said that every woman in America if they are beaten and abused by a man should be able to take that person to court. Meaning you should be able to go to federal court and sue in federal court the man who abused you if you can prove that abuse. But they said no that a woman, there’s no federal jurisdiction and I held, they acknowledged, I held about 1,000 hours of hearings proving that there’s an effect in interstate commerce. Women who are abused and beaten and beaten are women who are not able to be in the work force. And the Supreme Court said there is an impact on commerce but this is federalizing a private crime and we’re not going to allow it. I think the Supreme Court was wrong about that decision.
For the relevance of interstate commerce to deciding whether something is a federal issue or not, see here. For Violence Against Women act, see here.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 06:06 pm (UTC)I agree with you in that Senator Biden's argument is specious, and that the Commerce Clause is already inappropriately overused.
On the other hand, I'd rather hear a well-thought paragraph with which I disagreed than the ignorance coming from Governor Palin.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 07:32 pm (UTC)It's the Partial Birth Abortion Act that is about interstate commerce in the weird way -- "Any physician who, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion."
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 07:33 pm (UTC)